Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A515-56G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire A515-56G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Iris_TL
Memory17.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221031
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '22 at 17:24
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User LKA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 48.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 253
78% 150 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 485
55% 432 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3802
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 4.3
2% 10.7 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Lexar 512GB SSD
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.19.B3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 613 725 782 756 930 678 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 817
Write 458
Mixed 458
SusWrite 748
139% 620 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 14.6
59% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 56.8
DQ Mixed 66.6
53% 76.3 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 364%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
39GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 114 110 115 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 95.9
Write 96.3
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 112
64% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
157% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Netac Co Ltd Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.4% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 16.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 13.3
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 166
24% 166 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-56G Builds (Compare 1,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-56G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback