Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A515-56G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-56G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Iris_TL
Memory17.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220729
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 09:57
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 68.7
1-Core 143
2-Core 249
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 537
57% 458 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Lighting 11.6
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 2.2
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 6.8
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.32%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Lexar 512GB SSD
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.19.B3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 876 902 1042 1146 1134 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,337
Write 1,082
Mixed 1,090
SusWrite 1,020
254% 1,132 MB/s
4K Read 44.5
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 47.5
170% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 94.1
114% 203 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 180%
Great: 364%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
92GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 82
Write 66.1
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 58.4
45% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.7
159% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Netac Co Ltd Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.7% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 23
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 18
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A515-56G Builds (Compare 1,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-56G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback