QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory23.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 23.5GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory18 GB free of 23.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '22 at 13:47
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X 12-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 158
2-Core 332
104% 194 Pts
4-Core 640
8-Core 1,274
113% 957 Pts
64-Core 1,860
115% 1,860 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.4% Very good
Lighting 99.2
Reflection 96.8
Parallax 90.7
81% 95.6 fps
MRender 96.7
Gravity 90.1
Splatting 76.9
71% 87.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 483GB
232GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 271 256 256 268 296 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 23GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 7680 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 62.8
MC Write 39.7
MC Mixed 42.3
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.7
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 36.9
85% 29.9 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 128%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback