Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81F4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81F4  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191009
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 14 '22 at 05:18
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7020U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Memory 50.1
1-Core 39.4
2-Core 96
36% 61.8 Pts
4-Core 120
8-Core 91.7
15% 106 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 396B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
3.61% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 0.2
4% 2.77 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 0.1
3% 4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X4152012
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 30 21 43 39 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 332
Write 145
Mixed 70.1
SusWrite 46.1
32% 148 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 20.4
4K Mixed 24
67% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 164
DQ Mixed 173
149% 224 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
210GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 112 113 114 117 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 13
Write 19.4
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 115
29% 39.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 13.4
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81F4 Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback