PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 49.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus B85M-E (all builds) |
Memory | 8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180404 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 05 '22 at 08:51 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B0) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 76 81 72 74 74 MB/s
|
37.6%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$104
624GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 255 308 332 330 332 MB/s
|
71.9%
Very good
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
503GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 159 155 141 164 148 MB/s
|
73%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 99U5471-047.A00LF 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
22.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 397x |
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 323x |
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples | 259x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 327x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 201x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 175x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $343 |