Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 46% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8850H 20,669 User benchmarks, average bench 71% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Memory 28.7 1-Core 104 2-Core 199 56% 111 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 538 50% 419 Pts	64-Core 641 40% 641 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 087D) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	4.92% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 29.6 Parallax 6.6 4% 13.8 fps	MRender 6.6 Gravity 6 Splatting 9 6% 7.2 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.92% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ca3-8d512-q11 NVMe LITEON 512GB 702 User benchmarks, average bench 163% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: C49110B Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 304 378 397 412 388 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	86.2% Excellent	Read 540 Write 414 Mixed 433 SusWrite 390 100% 444 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 24.5 84% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 438 DQ Write 227 DQ Mixed 384 271% 349 MB/s
Poor: 98% ↑ This bench: 86.2% Great: 234%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43DB1-CTD 1x16GB 21,753 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	26.2% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 4.1 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,664x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	367x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	310x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	314x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $33Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	151x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	150x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,839 samples	336x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GBUnknownBench 79%, 7,078 samples	293x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	154x