Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro10,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemApple MacBookPro10,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-C3EC7CD22292981F
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 16 '22 at 14:54
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3615QM
U2E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 24.5
2-Core 58.1
31% 46.6 Pts
4-Core 98
8-Core 126
14% 112 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M
Apple(106B 00F2) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 425.31
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.8% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 4.9
2% 4.23 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 4.4
3% 4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 2.8%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OSC mSATA 256GB
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0927A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 233 229 231 235 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
46% Average
Read 326
Write 230
Mixed 179
SusWrite 233
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 26.3
4K Mixed 9.7
43% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 65.8
67% 109 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 46%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
47.8% Average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 17
54% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.6
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro10,1 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro10,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback