Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 21:02
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 77
1-Core 121
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 604
67% 527 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 42.1
Parallax 38.9
31% 39.7 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 40
Splatting 28
28% 35.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Digifast Chevron Black+ 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1145 957 987 1012 1008 1010 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,488
Write 2,178
Mixed 1,595
SusWrite 1,020
355% 1,570 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 65.8
214% 78 MB/s
DQ Read 950
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 823
603% 795 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 223%
Great: 333%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3200 C18 Series 3600 C20 Series 32GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93.8% Outstanding
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 30.3
96% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.8
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 26.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,237 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $355
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback