Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion Sleekbook 15 PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18FE
Memory	1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140606
Uptime	14.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 29 '22 at 11:00
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	94%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Memory 61.9 1-Core 38.2 2-Core 24.8 32% 41.6 Pts	4-Core 80.7 8-Core 89.4 11% 85.1 Pts	64-Core 89.1 6% 89.1 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 18FE) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.92% Terrible	Lighting 3.6 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 2.6 3% 3.17 fps	MRender 3.8 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 4.4 3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.92% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 747GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 270 367 334 268 307 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	63% Good	Read 334 Write 317 Mixed 345 SusWrite 309 74% 326 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 31.8 4K Mixed 24.2 74% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 194 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 147 114% 157 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ40UG8BBU0-GN-F Adata AD73I1C1674EV 8GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 10.6 MC Mixed 9.5 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.7 15% 5.37 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	173x
GeForce GT 630MNvidiaBench 3%, 7,774 samples	24x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	14x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 5,120 samples	19x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	16x
16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 1x4GBMicronBench 27%, 6,018 samples	13x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $253