Asus X202E

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Asus X202E (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X202E
Memory	0.3 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121106
Uptime	10.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration	192 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	55%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3217U 28,188 User benchmarks, average bench 43% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	27.6% Poor	Memory 48.6 1-Core 19 2-Core 38.6 25% 35.4 Pts	4-Core 40.3 8-Core 47.2 6% 43.8 Pts	64-Core 56.5 4% 56.5 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 108D) 1.2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.4 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.4 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 502ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 78 73 82 82 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	20% Poor	Read 66.6 Write 97 Mixed 102 SusWrite 77.8 20% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 10.8 4K Mixed 8.2 28% 8.83 MB/s	DQ Read 112 DQ Write 69.9 DQ Mixed 84.9 65% 89 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 83%
SDXC Card 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 979GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 6.7 Write 13.2 Mixed 8 13% 9.3 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.3 119% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G4E1 1x2GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 1 of 4 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 4.5 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 1.9 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 1 5% 1.77 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 27%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X202E Builds (Compare 158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X202E

CPU
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	126x
Core i3-2365MIntelBench 41%, 2,016 samples	30x
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	128x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	30x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x
840 250GBSamsung $251Bench 70%, 41,998 samples	3x

RAM
8KTF51264HZ-1G4E1 1x4GBMicronBench 23%, 1,492 samples	76x
EBJ41UF8BCS0-DJ-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 25%, 6,552 samples	72x
4KTF25664HZ-1G4E1 1x2GBMicronBench 20%, 230 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16