Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110N-CF  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160316
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateSep 09 '22 at 23:27
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 104
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 392
51% 386 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
4.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.2
5% 3.13 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 0.2
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.06%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 32 2.6 74 96 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.3% Poor
Read 81.4
Write 247
Mixed 12.9
SusWrite 58.2
23% 100 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 71.6
4K Mixed 8.7
54% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 168
DQ Write 96.5
DQ Mixed 0.1
36% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 86%
Samsung HD204UI 240GB
60GB free
Firmware: S8FM07.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 308 271 426 438 429 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 471
Write 388
Mixed 235
SusWrite 382
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 21.6
94% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 67.2
76% 128 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%
SAMSUNG SSD PM85 256GB
69GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 39 40 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.1% Very good
Read 38.3
Write 38.6
Mixed 36.4
SusWrite 41
53% 38.6 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 14.4
1,188% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 16
DQ Write 23
DQ Mixed 15.8
1,379% 18.3 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.6% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 10.3
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110N-CF Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110N-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback