Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive90.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i7KYB
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211029
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 07 '22 at 19:48
Run Duration414 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6770HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 64.9
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 145
58% 99.9 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 395
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
Intel(8086 2064) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.92% Terrible
Lighting 12.5
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 14.5
10% 11.3 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 13.6
Splatting 0.2
6% 9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.92%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 60 64 62 61 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 467
Write 386
Mixed 348
SusWrite 101
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 50.1
163% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 360
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 326
247% 332 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 122%
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$120
19GB free
Firmware: E7FT04.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 848
Write 1,040
Mixed 668
191% 852 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 28.2
89% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 655
DQ Write 529
DQ Mixed 476
388% 554 MB/s
Poor: 90% Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4SFS8213.C8FBD1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 11.6
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 7.3
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback