Today's hottest deals

MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7992
MotherboardMSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170505
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateAug 16 '20 at 15:32
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-9590-$298
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 75
2-Core 136
61% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 393
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435
Gigabyte(1458 355A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
29.7% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 33
Parallax 42
28% 36.6 fps
MRender 46.1
Gravity 41.3
Splatting 33.8
32% 40.4 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$120
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E7FT04.9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 191 191 198 201 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 755
Write 199
Mixed 268
SusWrite 190
77% 353 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 30.5
108% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 479
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 233
200% 303 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-10666CL9-4GBNT Kingston 9905474-060.A00LF 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992) Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI 970A GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7992)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $144
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback