Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Chuwi?innovation?and?technology(shenzhen)co.,ltd GemiBook Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	To To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210312
Uptime	12.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 04 '22 at 23:23
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	21.7% Poor	Memory 12.3 1-Core 56.9 2-Core 114 30% 60.9 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 176 24% 178 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 21.7% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.15% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.6 0% 1.4 fps	MRender 0.2 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.15% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac S535N8/256GYN 256GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 81GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 26 17 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Read 400 Write 356 Mixed 329 SusWrite 25.5 62% 277 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 25.8 4K Mixed 0.9 27% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 50.9 DQ Mixed 28.2 41% 80.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 4 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	MC Read 8.7 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 12.7 30% 10.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 383 10% 383 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	27x
Celeron J4115IntelBench 34%, 544 samples	5x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	32x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x3GBABCDBench 23%, 488 samples	32x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16