Today's hottest deals

Asus P5QPL-AM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5QPL-AM  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '22 at 13:09
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 71%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Memory 31.4
1-Core 21.7
2-Core 26.5
18% 26.5 Pts
4-Core 56.7
8-Core 59
8% 57.8 Pts
64-Core 55.7
3% 55.7 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Asus(1043 836D) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
0.22% Terrible
Lighting 0.4
Reflection 0.7
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.53 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.22%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 100 125 96 148 108 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.7% Below average
Read 150
Write 81.9
Mixed 99.4
SusWrite 126
26% 114 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 13.1
53% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 26.1
DQ Mixed 19.1
15% 20.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 3.8
11% 3.93 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.8
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 247
16% 247 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5QPL-AM Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QPL-AM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback