Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190425
Uptime17.5 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 15:48
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70% Good
Memory 76.3
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 169
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 360
49% 365 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Lighting 14
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 20.1
11% 15.9 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 12.6
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GMTS820S 120GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0509A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 342
Mixed 337
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 23.9
107% 38.8 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 43.6
66% 123 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 79%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 178 171 166 181 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 139
Write 150
Mixed 66
SusWrite 166
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
203% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 88%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
0GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.5
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.3
8% 9 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD44GU480-32A160T 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.8% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 23.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 17.6
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 87.8
46% 87.8 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,614 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback