Today's hottest deals

Apple MacBookPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemApple MacBookPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F22589C8
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 22:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 M 620
U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 65.3
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 128
54% 89.7 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 186
25% 185 Pts
64-Core 182
11% 182 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M
Apple(106B 00C8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 261.41
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.1
2% 1.93 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 2
Splatting 2.6
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000L1 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 149 150 151 150 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.4% Below average
Read 155
Write 154
Mixed 130
SusWrite 150
33% 147 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 22.8
4K Mixed 16.3
57% 18.3 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 41.6
DQ Mixed 23
20% 28.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 88%
USB3.0 Super Speed 1TB
174GB free, PID 0562
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 24 24 23 23 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 21.3
Mixed 22
SusWrite 24.1
32% 23.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 149%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 10.6
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookPro6,1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 29% - Poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback