Today's hottest deals

MSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7817
MotherboardMSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817)  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130917
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateAug 19 '22 at 13:40
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 558
62% 485 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6570
Sapphire(174B E193) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 6.7
Parallax 5.8
6% 6.4 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.5
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 272 159 78 102 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 425
Write 292
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 162
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 28.2
110% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 205
174% 251 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 107%
General USB Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 800b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.1 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.14% Terrible
Read 13.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 6.1
9% 7.63 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.14%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 99U5474-026.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.5% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 16.7
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 19.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-E33 (MS-7817) Builds (Compare 2,942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H81M-E33 (MS-7817) - $98

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback