Asus TUF GAMING B560M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics66.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-E  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 17 '22 at 22:22
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-10900-$276
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 275
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 976
92% 765 Pts
64-Core 1,683
104% 1,683 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.6% Good
Lighting 87.6
Reflection 125
Parallax 74.5
71% 95.8 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 76.2
Splatting 68.7
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
386GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK7N02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1563 1570 674 92 93 315 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 1,004
Write 1644
Mixed 1,165
SusWrite 718
256% 1,132 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 64.2
227% 84.7 MB/s
DQ Read 656
DQ Write 865
DQ Mixed 770
579% 764 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 188%
Great: 246%
SSD HEORIADY HX-001 F 240G 240GB
67GB free
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.1 9.6 8.7 12 18 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 234
Write 303
Mixed 252
SusWrite 12.1
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 24.2
4K Mixed 10.3
26% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 77.9
DQ Mixed 1.4
13% 27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 96%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$50
119GB free
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 90 134 119 113 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 360
Write 366
Mixed 235
SusWrite 144
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 15.1
58% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 68.8
DQ Mixed 16.9
33% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 55%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
46GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 44 47 50 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 73.2
Write 83.5
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 49.3
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
526GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 97 84 89 90 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 14.4
Write 61.3
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 92.4
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G26C16U4W.8FD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
79.6% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 31.8
MC Mixed 24.4
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 24.4
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B560M-E Builds (Compare 718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $456
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback