Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory17.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateAug 13 '22 at 00:39
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$140
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Memory 92.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 250
89% 158 Pts
4-Core 495
8-Core 804
80% 650 Pts
64-Core 1,067
66% 1,067 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$115
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (66 fps cap detected)
53.1% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 67.6
Parallax 61.5
53% 64.9 fps
MRender 65.9
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 61.4
52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g TOSHIBA 256GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 13 14 13 21 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 497
Write 119
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 22.4
35% 166 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 11.3
4K Mixed 11.4
68% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 20.4
DQ Mixed 116
103% 164 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 147%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
871GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 185 182 186 186 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 187
Mixed 90.2
SusWrite 184
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 107%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 201 205 203 204 206 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 118
Mixed 78.6
SusWrite 201
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U6D8ME-16X KHX2666C16/16G 32GB
2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 29.7
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 27.8
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,585 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 116% - Outstanding Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback