Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E410MA_E410MA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E410MA_E410MA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK E410MA
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210527
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 12 '22 at 04:39
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4020
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Memory 40.5
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 70.1
35% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 91.7
8-Core 103
13% 97.1 Pts
64-Core 99.2
6% 99.2 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 29%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Asus(1043 10E2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.52% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 2
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.52%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
171GB free
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 148 176 173 170 172 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Read 776
Write 727
Mixed 770
SusWrite 204
139% 619 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 46.9
4K Mixed 18.5
94% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 194
144% 190 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 226%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.8
15% 5.23 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 1.1
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E410MA_E410MA Builds (Compare 132 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUS Laptop E410MA_E410MA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback