Today's hottest deals

Asus K30BF_M32BF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K30BF_M32BF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30BF_M32BF
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 08 '22 at 11:08
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-6300 APU-$51
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 60.7
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 92.9
45% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 91.2
8-Core 91.7
12% 91.4 Pts
64-Core 92.2
6% 92.2 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8490
Asus(1043 8636) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.3% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.8
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 2.4
2% 2.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.3%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
296GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 69 65 104 92 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 104
Write 109
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 87
64% 87.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 69%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 4GB
4GB free, PID a764
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 6.7 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6.16% Terrible
Read 18.1
Write 6
Mixed 5
SusWrite 6.7
10% 8.95 MB/s
4K Read 8.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
33% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.16%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.7% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8.7
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30BF_M32BF Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K30BF_M32BF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback