Today's hottest deals

Foxconn H61MXV/H67MXV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardFoxconn H61MXV/H67MXV  (all builds)
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20110228
Uptime6 Days
Run DateDec 31 '21 at 15:19
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2310-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
69.1% Good
Memory 85
1-Core 81
2-Core 161
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 306
41% 308 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 2GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.17% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 6.8
Parallax 1.8
5% 4.93 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 6.8
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.17%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 110 113 116 113 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 122
Write 108
Mixed 60.8
SusWrite 114
23% 101 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 9.5
4K Mixed 1.1
14% 5.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 39%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 63 49 56 45 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Read 68
Write 66.7
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 52.5
42% 57 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 43%
Seagate Desktop 500GB
102GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 23.6
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 19
31% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
368GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 23.1
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 19
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
51% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16.4
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61MXV/H67MXV Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn H61MXV/H67MXV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback