Today's hottest deals

Asrock H61M-VS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-VS  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110817
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 21:29
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2100-$49
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 84.4
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 124
60% 96 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 205
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 204
13% 204 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350
PowerColor(148C 3003) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1.5
Parallax 1.5
0% 1.2 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
649GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 71 18 49 56 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 73.6
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 55.1
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
27% 9.33 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-VS Builds (Compare 384 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-VS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $74
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback