Today's hottest deals

HP Pro 3405 Series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pro 3405 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACF
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110816
Uptime60.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '22 at 20:44
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3650 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 69.7
1-Core 40.5
2-Core 80.5
42% 63.6 Pts
4-Core 150
8-Core 126
19% 138 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6530D Graphics
HP(103C 2ACF) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.862.3.0
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
2.08% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.73 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 3.1
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.08%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP2O
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21.8
Mixed 14
14% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
30% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 5.7
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.03 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pro 3405 Series Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pro 3405 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $30
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback