Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Laptop 15-da0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A7
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210203
Uptime45.7 Days
Run DateAug 01 '22 at 11:37
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 204
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 461
51% 402 Pts
64-Core 461
29% 461 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 84A7) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9171
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 7.2
6% 8.3 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
852GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RSM7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 34 15 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 44.3
Write 45.5
Mixed 40.8
SusWrite 20.7
28% 37.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 71%
StoreJet Transcend 2TB
984GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 94 94 94 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 138
Write 115
Mixed 68.4
SusWrite 94.1
135% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.3
173% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 10.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.7
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15-da0xxx Builds (Compare 5,018 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-da0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback