HP 23-e000eg

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 23-e000eg  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AF1
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 30 '22 at 09:54
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 142
60% 98.9 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 205
28% 207 Pts
64-Core 218
14% 218 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610
HP(103C 2AF1) 1,024MB
Ram: 1,023MB, Driver: 305.93
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
2.4% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 0.6
2% 2.3 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.4%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
884GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR20002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 59 38 31 34 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 62.6
Write 77
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 41.6
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30%
Great: 59%
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 64GB-$72
17GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 227
Write 136
Mixed 58.4
154% 140 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 6.6
590% 8.33 MB/s
DQ Read 8.5
DQ Write 9.6
DQ Mixed 7.6
616% 8.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.7
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-e000eg Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 23-e000eg

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback