Today's hottest deals

HP 23-e000es

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 23-e000es  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AF1
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120928
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 22 '21 at 18:56
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470T-$130
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 65
2-Core 112
57% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 227
8-Core 213
30% 220 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 610
HP(103C 2AF1) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
2.97% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.5
3% 2.6 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.97%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
829GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 6.6 20 41 34 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 13.3
Write 29.3
Mixed 4
SusWrite 23.6
13% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1600S364L11S/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
32.1% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 23-e000es Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 23-e000es

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback