Today's hottest deals

HP 20-c005la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP 20-c005la  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8245
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180726
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '22 at 23:19
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Memory 40.1
1-Core 22.2
2-Core 39.5
23% 33.9 Pts
4-Core 73
8-Core 86.6
10% 79.8 Pts
64-Core 89.2
6% 89.2 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics
HP(103C 8245) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 17.12
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
1.84% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.8
Splatting 3.6
2% 2.63 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.84%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
725GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 52 56 103 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 56.2
Write 88.9
Mixed 12.7
SusWrite 66.6
40% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 6.4
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 5.6
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 202
20% 202 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20-c005la Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: HP 20-c005la

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback