Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime12.6 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 08:14
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 95.5
2-Core 188
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 350
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.2.1
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Lighting 16.3
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 21.7
13% 22 fps
MRender 26.6
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 20
17% 20.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 120 131 74 134 146 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 423
Write 364
Mixed 166
SusWrite 144
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 29.8
4K Mixed 13.2
59% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 26.4
38% 71.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 55%
WDC WDS250G2B0A-00SM50 250GB
22GB free
Firmware: 401020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 209 207 210 183 213 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.7% Good
Read 244
Write 218
Mixed 222
SusWrite 206
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 32.5
107% 34.9 MB/s
DQ Read 210
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 179
141% 195 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 105%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
8GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 6.6 6.5 6.4 7.2 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.31% Terrible
Read 2
Write 2.8
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 6
6% 3.78 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.31%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905584-037.A00LF 8634 SUPERTALENT02 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8634 SUPERTALENT02 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 81.6
49% 81.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback