Today's hottest deals

MSI 870A Fuzion (MS-7660)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.5% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7660
MotherboardMSI 870A Fuzion (MS-7660)  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110222
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 16 '16 at 22:42
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 84
1-Core 49.6
2-Core 99.9
51% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 199
26% 199 Pts
64-Core 200
12% 200 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720
Gigabyte(1458 366D) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6191
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
3.5% Terrible
Lighting 4.23
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 3.78
4% 3.92 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 3.17
Splatting 5.17
4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.5%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SHFS37A240G 240GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 605A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 318
Write 214
Mixed 231
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 17.5
80% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 62.8
78% 137 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 77%
Promise 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 1TB
422GB free
Firmware: 1.10
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 144
Mixed 157
123% 163 MB/s
4K Read 2.35
4K Write 3.64
4K Mixed 0.79
253% 2.26 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673EH1-CH9 M378B5673EH1-CH9 Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG Nanya NT2GC64B8HC0NF-CG 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 12.8
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 8.3
20% 7.17 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 870A Fuzion (MS-7660) Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A Fuzion (MS-7660)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback