Today's hottest deals

MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics86.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7A68
MotherboardMSI Z270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68)  (all builds)
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 28 '22 at 01:58
Run Duration287 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$90
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 108
2-Core 174
74% 124 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 246
31% 234 Pts
64-Core 253
16% 253 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$245
ASRock(1849 5217) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86.4% Excellent
Lighting 86.3
Reflection 128
Parallax 165
70% 126 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 89
Splatting 151
118% 144 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 371 363 318 264 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 298
Write 396
Mixed 334
SusWrite 321
76% 337 MB/s
4K Read 32.6
4K Write 71.5
4K Mixed 47.4
148% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 158
170% 285 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68) Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z270 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $487
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback