Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD4-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P67A-UD4-B3  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 05:51
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 88
2-Core 171
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 335
45% 334 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI HD 4870
Sapphire(174B E114) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
9.95% Terrible
Lighting 13.5
Reflection 14.7
Parallax 9.7
11% 12.6 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 9.9
8% 9.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.95%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-000H1 256GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 311 315 315 353 316 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 222
Mixed 274
SusWrite 329
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 41.9
153% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 354
267% 359 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 102%
Great: 122%
WD Re 2TB-$30
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01D03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 71 71 71 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 75.5
Write 69.9
Mixed 52.3
SusWrite 70.6
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
200% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
35.2% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.7
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P67A-UD4-B3 Builds (Compare 277 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P67A-UD4-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback