Today's hottest deals

Biostar TA785G3+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics47% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar TA785G3+  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 07:31
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 78.2
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 95.5
47% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 194
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 192
12% 192 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1314 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47% Average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 60.9
Parallax 82.7
48% 67.4 fps
MRender 60.5
Gravity 66.8
Splatting 44.5
46% 57.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST4000LM024-2AN17V 4TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 33 31 36 57 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29% Poor
Read 58.5
Write 103
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 41.5
48% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.7
177% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12.1
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.5
21% 7.2 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TA785G3+ Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar TA785G3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback