Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130816
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 18 '22 at 06:12
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 77.9
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 116
50% 80.8 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 202
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
HP(103C 1850) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Lighting 3.5
Reflection 4
Parallax 9
3% 5.5 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 5.4
4% 4.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP613PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 72 112 55 75 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 404
Write 206
Mixed 286
SusWrite 77.6
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 15.8
32% 12.6 MB/s
DQ Read 70.9
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 162
103% 115 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 36%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
S M 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.9% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback