Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '21 at 01:35
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800B APU (2012 D.Tr)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 70.4
2-Core 130
58% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 215
29% 216 Pts
64-Core 214
13% 214 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
HP(103C 1850) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 5.7
Parallax 0.2
0% 2 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$21
260GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 93 85 89 92 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 97.7
Write 99.5
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 91.4
64% 87.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.2
77% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
29GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 10 7.7 8.3 7.8 7.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
9.63% Terrible
Read 26.3
Write 12.3
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 7.7
17% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2
117% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.63%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
M 8 U E 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.7% Below average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 10.7
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.43 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback