Today's hottest deals

Schenker P7xxTM1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSchenker P7xxTM1  (all builds)
MotherboardSCHENKER P7xxTM1
Memory56.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191213
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '22 at 00:49
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$240
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 81.6
1-Core 147
2-Core 293
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 532
8-Core 1,116
96% 824 Pts
64-Core 1,089
67% 1,089 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 7710) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.29
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Lighting 99.8
Reflection 126
Parallax 98.5
81% 108 fps
MRender 88.4
Gravity 101
Splatting 106
81% 98.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 839
Write 2,041
Mixed 1,299
316% 1,393 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 75.6
253% 90.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,447
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 1,251
944% 1,272 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$165
1.5TB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 471 474 473 472 473 471 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 462
Mixed 436
SusWrite 472
105% 468 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 52.2
173% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 356
268% 359 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84% Excellent
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 27.2
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 34.7
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7xxTM1 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

System: Schenker P7xxTM1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback