| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 11.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock AB350 Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180115 |
| Uptime | 18.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 04 '22 at 03:49 |
| Run Duration | 177 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.3%
Very good
|
76% 139 Pts
|
66% 539 Pts
|
51% 825 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.9%
Poor
|
30% 37.6 fps
|
18% 25.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 25 30 44 1.8 5.2 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
19% 87.7 MB/s
|
0% 0 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 195 191 193 195 196 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
108% 148 MB/s
|
149% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32%
Below average
|
31% 10.9 GB/s
|
26% 9.27 GB/s
|
41% 97.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical AB350 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,981 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock AB350 Pro4 - $121
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 463x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 223x |
| Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples | 131x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 202x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 166x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 114x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $490 |