Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 31% Sail boat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0 6,987 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 89 2-Core 177 67% 116 Pts	4-Core 347 8-Core 668 60% 507 Pts	64-Core 874 54% 874 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04 Performing below potential (69^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.6% Average	Lighting 57 Reflection 59.9 Parallax 75.3 46% 64.1 fps	MRender 60.8 Gravity 60 Splatting 43.9 44% 54.9 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB 14,997 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 42 20 19 47 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 108 Write 132 Mixed 56 SusWrite 35.9 61% 83 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 76%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 4.8 3.6 3.6 3 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.87% Terrible	Read 23.8 Write 14.2 Mixed 2.5 SusWrite 3.5 12% 11 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.87% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C 2x16GB 48 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	30.9% Below average	MC Read 11 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 30%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
36KSF1G72PZ-1 4x8GBMicronBench 79%, 110 samples	8x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	4x
M393B5170FH0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 676 samples	3x

Value: 39% - Below average

Total price: $198