To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '21 at 22:06
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 86.8
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 663
60% 505 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$265
Nvidia(10DE 12FD) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 108
Parallax 120
93% 114 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 101
Splatting 92.7
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-512 512GB
249GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0828A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1317 479 190 189 176 170 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,465
Write 1232
Mixed 1,042
SusWrite 420
232% 1,040 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 29
143% 56.3 MB/s
DQ Read 536
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 496
370% 492 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 149%
Great: 264%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
170GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 462 459 459 428 400 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 464
Mixed 459
SusWrite 445
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 47.1
153% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 298
242% 344 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT42GR7MFR4C 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 20.5
64% 22.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback