Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 80E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 4B2
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140826
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJun 03 '22 at 14:22
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6310 APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
40% Below average
Memory 59.8
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 66.8
35% 53.5 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 121
16% 120 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 40%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
Legend(17AA 3801) 512MB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1065.0
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0003SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 32 43 38 43 45 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 43
Write 50.2
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 38.7
30% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 39%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
6GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 14 9.6 9.7 9.5 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 22.8
Write 14.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 11.9
18% 14.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 2
132% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 13%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
0GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29
Write 7.2
Mixed 7.5
14% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M478B5273EBO-YKO Micron 4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 4GB
800, 800 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.5% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.37 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80E1 Builds (Compare 110 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback