Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 30 '22 at 04:28
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 234
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 621
65% 524 Pts
64-Core 741
46% 741 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 39FE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.89
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
24.8% Poor
Lighting 31.3
Reflection 31
Parallax 31.9
26% 31.4 fps
MRender 35.1
Gravity 33.5
Splatting 20.4
23% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 25%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$249
305GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 554 552 545 548 545 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 865
Write 646
Mixed 466
SusWrite 560
142% 634 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 56.5
189% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,118
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 933
688% 914 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 168%
Great: 363%
WDC WD10SPZX-24Z10T0 1TB
462GB free
Firmware: M0CR070
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 405 416 418 405 366 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 343
Write 405
Mixed 317
SusWrite 404
83% 367 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 35.2
110% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 357
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 337
252% 336 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
47.4% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 13.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,260 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback