Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190722
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '22 at 00:04
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 64.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 194
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 382
52% 385 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5570
MSI(1462 2207) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
4.91% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 7.7
Parallax 5.1
5% 6.27 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 6.5
5% 6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.91%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 96 77 87 99 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 83.1
Write 124
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 92.8
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
42.4% Average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M GAMING Builds (Compare 1,975 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback