PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus H110M-R (all builds) |
Memory | 1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160526 |
Uptime | 6.9 Days |
Run Date | May 20 '22 at 14:25 |
Run Duration | 164 Seconds |
Run User | CZE-User |
Background CPU | 60% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
54.8%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 20 34 32 31 30 MB/s
|
72.4%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$50
36GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 256 140 144 111 110 113 MB/s
|
72.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 9905625-062.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
30.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 988x |
Core i3-7100Intel $35Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 389x |
Core i7-7700Intel $179Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 300x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 547x |
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 357x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 330x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $154 |