Today's hottest deals

Asus M4N68T V2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M4N68T V2  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '22 at 18:36
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 560
AM3, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Memory 88.9
1-Core 50
2-Core 99.6
52% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 97.7
8-Core 100
13% 98.9 Pts
64-Core 99.8
6% 99.8 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
MSI(1462 2204) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
6% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 6.2
6% 7.57 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$28
400GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 77 82 91 97 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 93.4
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 83.9
59% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 166 167 177 179 180 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 10
28% 9.87 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.7
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N68T V2 Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback