Today's hottest deals

Toshiba SATELLITE C660

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE C660  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA PWWHA
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 02 '22 at 15:05
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IRQ-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 85.4
1-Core 74
2-Core 117
58% 92 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 179
24% 179 Pts
64-Core 179
11% 179 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Toshiba(1179 FC90) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.78% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 0.5
0% 1.33 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 3.2
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.78%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS547550A9E384 500GB-$60
439GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JE3OA60B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 62 58 62 61 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 30.7
Write 60.5
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 58.3
34% 46.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
30% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 8.9
27% 9.43 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.47 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE C660 Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C660

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback