Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8440p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemHP EliteBook 8440p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 172B
Memory2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 08 '22 at 16:24
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 520-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 65.8
1-Core 71.8
2-Core 123
52% 87 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 158
22% 160 Pts
64-Core 165
10% 165 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 3100M
HP(103C 172B) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.08% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 4
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.93 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.08%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marshal MAL2500SA-T72 500GB
427GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH000C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 84 76 88 84 90 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.8% Average
Read 90.5
Write 93.3
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 82.8
60% 81.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
25.6% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.1
25% 8.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.2
20% 6.87 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8440p Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8440p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $95
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback