Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics41.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX HERO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '17 at 00:55
Run Duration301 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 94.4
1-Core 158
2-Core 316
103% 189 Pts
4-Core 609
8-Core 875
93% 742 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 104%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.2% Average
Lighting 47.8
Reflection 55.2
Parallax 44.7
39% 49.2 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 47.9
Splatting 52.7
46% 56.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
286GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$150
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 2,025
Write 885
Mixed 1,079
292% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 206
4K Mixed 48.1
250% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 673
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 174
214% 388 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 231%
Great: 243%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
2TB free
Firmware: HP51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 191
Mixed 183
140% 185 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.21
82% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
WD WD80EZZX-11CSGA0 8TB
744GB free
Firmware: 83.H0A03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 131
Write 138
Mixed 111
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.36
91% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$84
280GB free
Firmware: SC48 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
JMicron Generic DISK00 8TB
876GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 149
Write 116
Mixed 64.2
130% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 7.39
4K Mixed 0.41
268% 2.86 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 76%
JMicron Generic DISK02 8TB
327GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 121
Write 109
Mixed 67.4
121% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 7.65
4K Mixed 0.47
279% 2.94 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 80%
JMicron Generic DISK01 8TB
314GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Read 120
Write 166
Mixed 75.8
156% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 0.44
439% 4.56 MB/s
DQ Read 1.48
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 0.59
409% 4.44 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 91%
JMicron Generic DISK03 8TB
132GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 162
Write 118
Mixed 60.1
131% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 7.65
4K Mixed 0.62
285% 3.05 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2197 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 28.4
MC Mixed 21
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX HERO Builds (Compare 4,425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX HERO - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $739
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback