TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus PRIME H370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370-A  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 03 '22 at 03:40
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Memory 83.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 693
74% 590 Pts
64-Core 636
39% 636 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 86.7%
 Great: 91%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Gigabyte(1458 4072)
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.59
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 120
Parallax 125
109% 126 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 104
Splatting 90.2
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 106%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.57 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 12.3
8% 9.27 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 6.12%
 Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme ADATA LEGEND 840 1TB
739GB free (System drive)
Firmware: .3.P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1303 1322 1308 1296 1362 1316 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 1,238
Write 1,341
Mixed 1,219
SusWrite 1,318
289% 1,279 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 53.6
210% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 923
DQ Mixed 163
255% 465 MB/s
Poor: 221% ↑
This bench: 221%
 Great: 437%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905702-017.A00G Patriot PSD416G24002 Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68% Good
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 23.5
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PRIME H370-A Builds (Compare 587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370-A

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel  $186Bench 87%, 349,567 samples141x
Core i5-8400Intel  $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples67x
Core i5-9400FIntel  $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples59x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples34x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples28x
SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples29x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $84Bench 273%, 381,216 samples21x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples18x
RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX  $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples19x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 81%, 12,182 samples17x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples16x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $625
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback