| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 6.91% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20200716 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Apr 24 '22 at 19:46 |
| Run Duration | 258 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 35% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD PRO A8-9600 R7, 10 COMPUTE CORES 4C+6G
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
41.9%
Average
|
40% 68.7 Pts
|
24% 175 Pts
|
10% 158 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
PowerColor(148C 2385) 2GB
CLim: 1176 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.2.2
|
6.91%
Terrible
|
0% 20.7 fps
|
20% 24.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P180831a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 20 12 21 20 MB/s
|
||||
|
Seagate ST320LM001 HN-M320MBB 320GB
73GB free
Firmware: 2AR10002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 49 49 47 49 MB/s
|
30.6%
Below average
|
34% 46 MB/s
|
115% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
12GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.9 3.2 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
11% 9.83 MB/s
|
160% 2.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown MD401GNSE-CB4M2 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27%
Poor
|
28% 9.93 GB/s
|
16% 5.47 GB/s
|
27% 148 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,025 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 874x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 718x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 545x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 458x |
| RX 580AMD $120Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 429x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 407x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $348 |